CAR DIMENSIONS TOOL

COMPARE Cadillac CT6 (2016) with Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)

Home Breadcrumb Compare Breadcrumb Cadillac CT6 (2016) vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)
 
 
 

CAR 1

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
5182 mm204.02 inch
Width
1880 mm74.02 inch
Height
1471 mm57.91 inch
Weight
1654 kg3,646 lbs
Cargo space
433 liters15.29 ft3
Type
Sedan

CAR 2

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
5341 mm210.28 inch
Length
Width
2000 mm78.74 inch
Width
Height
1829 mm72.01 inch
Height
Weight
2753 kg6,069 lbs
Weight
Cargo space
560 liters19.78 ft3
Cargo space
Type
SUV
Type
 
 
 
 

Cadillac CT6 (2016) vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)

  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 1099 kg (2,423 lbs) lighter than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) is 159 mm (6.26 inch) longer, 120 mm (4.72 inch) wider, 358 mm (14.09 inch) higher and has 127 liters (4.48 ft3) bigger cargo space than Cadillac CT6 (2016).
 
 

Size difference at a glance

  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 3% shorter than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 6% narrower than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 19.6% lower than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 39.9% lighter than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Cadillac CT6 (2016) is 22.7% smaller in cargo space than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).

Overall footprint

Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) has a 9.6% larger overall footprint than Cadillac CT6 (2016) (length × width).

Summary

Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) is the larger car on 4 of 4 key dimensions.

Side-by-side size

Length
Width
Height
Weight
Cargo space
Cadillac CT6 (2016)    Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)