CAR DIMENSIONS TOOL

COMPARE Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) with Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)

Home Breadcrumb Compare Breadcrumb Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)
 
 
 

CAR 1

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
4371 mm172.09 inch
Width
1905 mm75.00 inch
Height
1648 mm64.88 inch
Weight
1785 kg3,935 lbs
Cargo space
611 liters21.58 ft3
Type
SUV

CAR 2

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
5341 mm210.28 inch
Length
Width
2000 mm78.74 inch
Width
Height
1829 mm72.01 inch
Height
Weight
2753 kg6,069 lbs
Weight
Cargo space
560 liters19.78 ft3
Cargo space
Type
SUV
Type
 
 
 
 

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)

  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 968 kg (2,134 lbs) lighter and has 51 liters (1.80 ft3) bigger cargo space than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) is 970 mm (38.19 inch) longer, 95 mm (3.74 inch) wider and 181 mm (7.13 inch) higher than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016).
 
 

Size difference at a glance

  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 18.2% shorter than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 4.8% narrower than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 9.9% lower than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 35.2% lighter than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).
  • Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) is 9.1% larger in cargo space than Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019).

Overall footprint

Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) has a 28.3% larger overall footprint than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016) (length × width).

Summary

Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019) is the larger car on 3 of 4 key dimensions.

Side-by-side size

Length
Width
Height
Weight
Cargo space
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2016)    Rolls-Royce Cullinan (2019)