CAR DIMENSIONS TOOL

COMPARE Mazda CX-3 (2016) with Nissan X-Trail (2014)

Home Breadcrumb Compare Breadcrumb Mazda CX-3 (2016) vs Nissan X-Trail (2014)
 
 
 

CAR 1

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
4275 mm168.31 inch
Width
1765 mm69.49 inch
Height
1535 mm60.43 inch
Weight
1300 kg2,866 lbs
Cargo space
504 liters17.80 ft3
Type
SUV

CAR 2

Make
Model
Year
 
Length
4630 mm182.28 inch
Length
Width
1785 mm70.28 inch
Width
Height
1770 mm69.69 inch
Height
Weight
1500 kg3,307 lbs
Weight
Cargo space
565 liters19.95 ft3
Cargo space
Type
SUV
Type
 
 
 
 

Mazda CX-3 (2016) vs Nissan X-Trail (2014)

  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 200 kg (441 lbs) lighter than Nissan X-Trail (2014).
  • Nissan X-Trail (2014) is 355 mm (13.98 inch) longer, 20 mm (0.79 inch) wider, 235 mm (9.25 inch) higher and has 61 liters (2.15 ft3) bigger cargo space than Mazda CX-3 (2016).
 
 

Size difference at a glance

  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 7.7% shorter than Nissan X-Trail (2014).
  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 1.1% narrower than Nissan X-Trail (2014).
  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 13.3% lower than Nissan X-Trail (2014).
  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 13.3% lighter than Nissan X-Trail (2014).
  • Mazda CX-3 (2016) is 10.8% smaller in cargo space than Nissan X-Trail (2014).

Overall footprint

Nissan X-Trail (2014) has a 9.5% larger overall footprint than Mazda CX-3 (2016) (length × width).

Summary

Nissan X-Trail (2014) is the larger car on 4 of 4 key dimensions.

Side-by-side size

Length
Width
Height
Weight
Cargo space
Mazda CX-3 (2016)    Nissan X-Trail (2014)
 
 

Comparisons with Mazda CX-3 (2016)

Comparisons with Nissan X-Trail (2014)

 
Data Accuracy
Privacy Policy
[protected email]
Copyright © 2026
Car Dimensions Tool All rights reserved.